| |

CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES SITE
Democracy Returned
By Jessica Connor
Editor/Staff Associate, May 1998
On July 13, 1994, Cuban gun boats rammed and
fired water cannons at a small tugboat (13 de Marzo) carrying 75 people
fleeing Castro's Cuba, many of whom were small children. Instead of finding
freedom, 41 of the tugboat's passengers, including 21 children, found death
in Cuban waters.
To ensure that this brutality would not be
forgotten, a Miamibased Cuban exile group, El Movimiento Democracia (the
Democracy Movement) has for the last two years organized a flotilla in
remembrance of the massacre of those aboard the tugboat. Last July, as the
group prepared once again to set sail in memory of the victims of the
brutality of the Cuban navy, they were forced to endure another brand of
government intolerance this time at the hands of the U.S. government.
The organization's boat, M/V Democracia, was
about to depart from Key West Marina when the U.S. Coast Guard signaled the
boat to halt and informed the group that the boat was being seized under a
Declaration of National Emergency (Presidential Proclamation No. 6867,
issued by President Clinton on March 6, 1996). Under the Declaration, the
federal government invoked emergency authority to restrict travel by
seagoing vessels in and around South Florida. Under federal regulations
enforcing the proclamation, U.S. territorial seas and internal waterways of
the four southernmost Florida counties were declared a "security zone" in
which any "nonpublic vessel of less than 50 meters . . . may not get
underway in or depart the security zone with the intent to enter Cuban
territorial waters."
According to Democracy Movement National
Delegate Ramon Saul Sanchez, the boat was seized because the group had
indicated that it would attempt to take a rubber raft from a boat to the
location in Cuban waters where the tugboat had been attacked. The boat was
seized because Sanchez was on board (Sanchez was the only member of the
movement who had declared that he would enter Cuban territorial waters). It
was clear that the government was prepared to seize any vessel which Sanchez
boarded in an effort to silence him.
The group had wanted to place a white rose in
commemoration of the massacre. Sanchez said that the rose was "an expression
of our nonviolent claim for respect for human rights and our right to return
to our homeland." And, said Sanchez, "it was the U.S. government, not Cuba,
that interfered with our exercise of freedom of expression by seizing the
M/V Democracia." The flotilla continued without Sanchez, who remained in Key
West, his First Amendment rights violated.
In January, the Democracy Movement filed suit
in U.S. District Court seeking the return of the vessel, claiming that the
seizure and Presidential Proclamation itself were unconstitutional, and that
the government's indefinite holding of the vessel was unconstitutional and
violated federal forfeiture laws.
The Greater Miami Chapter of the American
Civil Liberties Union of Florida stepped into the lawsuit in support of the
Democracy Movement.
"The fact that the government did not
institute any forfeiture proceedings in holding the boat was particularly
disturbing," said ACLU of Florida Legal Director Andrew Kayton. "They had
the authority to seize the boat under the Proclamation, but they didn't
utilize any legal authority or process in keeping it."
Attorneys for the Democracy Movement, Andres
Rivero, Anastasia Garcia and Joseph S. Geller, and ACLU Cooperating Attorney
Sharon Kegerreis subpoenaed officials in the Clinton administration,
including National Security Advisor Sandy Berger and the former chief of the
U.S. Southern Command in South Florida, among others. The Democracy
Movement/ACLU legal team was prepared to argue that the issuance of the
Proclamation was unconstitutional and the seizure and holding of M/V
Democracia violated the Fourth Amendment and due process rights of the
Democracy Movement. Congressman Bob Menendez of New Jersey was prepared to
testify as the first witness for the plaintiffs. Trial was scheduled for
April 27.
In a surprising move, two days before trial,
the case settled in a victory for the Democracy Movement with the return of
its vessel complete with the repairs needed after almost a year in drydock.
"The settlement is a vindication for the
Democracy Movement and the legitimate First Amendment activities that they
have undertaken," Greater Miami Chapter President John de Leon noted.
"Getting the boat back was of tremendous symbolic importance."
Ramon Saul Sanchez of the Democracy Movement
added, "We are very grateful to the American Civil Liberties Union for
serving two things: for bringing about a reasonable and civilized solution
to the problem between the government and the Democracy Movement, and for
opening doors to the Cuban community to have more knowledge about the
importance of civil rights."
Newsletter Index
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Legal Updates
The ACLU represented Ramon Saul Sanchez, a hunger
striker in Miami, and Movimiento Democracia (Democracy Movement),
an organization promoting human rights and a peaceful transition to
democracy in Cuba. After filing suit on a First Amendment claim on May
17, the ACLU successfully secured a permit for Sanchez to conduct his
hunger strike on federal property. The ACLU also obtained the release
of the vessel, Human Rights, which had been confiscated by the
U.S. government. Securing the vessel's release was the purpose of
Sanchez's hunger strike. The boat was seized under a Presidential
Proclamation establishing a national security zone in waters surrounding
South Florida. The Miami Herald published an editorial praising
the ACLU for its efforts in resolving a locally tense situation.
Doe v. State of Florida HRS (Abortion Rights)
This action, filed in 1993, challenges the
constitutionality of the State of Florida's refusal to pay medical costs
for terminations of pregnancies for low-income women on Medicaid. In an
order dated April 29, 1999, the Florida First District Court of Appeal
certified the case to the Florida Supreme Court as an appeal involving
issues of "great public importance" or having "a great effect on the
proper administration of justice throughout the state."
Warner v. City of Boca Raton (Religious Expression)
In a disappointing ruling issued from the bench on March
31, U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Ryskamp held that the City of Boca
Raton's prohibition against vertical grave markers at the city cemetery
did not violate the plaintiffs' constitutional rights or the Florida
Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The City ordered vertical religious
symbols, statues, crucifixes and Stars of David to be removed or
destroyed. This is the first case brought under the new state RFRA.
The ACLU intends to appeal the district court's decision.
Newsletter Index
|
|
|
|
|