|
On 13 July
1994 at least 35 men, women and children were lost at sea when
the vessel on which they and others were attempting to flee
Cuba sank some seven miles out from Havana. The 31 survivors
were eventually picked up by coast guards and taken to shore
where the 20 male survivors were detained. Several of the
survivors allege that their vessel sank after it had been
pursued and assaulted by three other vessels, apparently
acting under official instructions, and that those on board
were given no opportunity to surrender. The Cuban Government
denied any responsibility for the sinking of the tugboat or
for the loss of life, alleging that it was an accident caused
by the irresponsible actions of those on board. However,
Amnesty International has received compelling evidence,
including eyewitness testimony from several of the survivors,
indicating that those on board the three pursuing vessels
employed excessive force disproportionate to the actual
situation and seemed to be taking orders from a fourth vessel.
They allege that their pursuers deliberately rammed the “13
de Marzo” and undertook other aggressive actions which
deliberately put at risk the lives of those on board, none of
whom, from the information so far available, even from
government sources, were armed or in a position to seriously
resist capture. If this was the case, Amnesty International
believes that those who perished in the incident were the
victims of extrajudicial execution.
On 21 July
1994 Amnesty International called on the Cuban authorities to
conduct a full and impartial investigation into the incident
and to make the findings public, and that if the investigation
revealed that any government official or agent acting on their
behalf committed an offence, to bring them to justice and to
give them a fair trial. It also called for the release of any
survivors detained as a result of the incident unless they
were charged with a recognized criminal offence and urged that
no reprisals be taken against those who spoke out about what
happened. Since then, despite calls to do so from human rights
defenders inside Cuba and international human rights bodies,
the Cuban authorities have not only failed to carry out an
adequate investigation of the incident but have also continued
to harass and intimidate those inside Cuba who have sought to
peacefully protest the sinking of the “13 de Marzo” or
commemorate the lives of those who died.
Context
It is
important to describe the context in which the sinking of the
“13 de Marzo” took place. In order to leave the
country, either to emigrate or simply to travel and return to
Cuba, Cuban citizens have to obtain an official exit permit.
Those who seek permission to emigrate have to be in possession
of a visa for another country and fulfill a series of other
requirements, including the payment of certain fees. In
practice, it is very difficult for most Cubans to meet such
conditions. Many resort to trying to leave by illegal means,
usually by sea, often floating on homemade rafts or inner
tubes of tires. Over the years many people have reportedly
perished trying to make the 90-mile crossing to the United
States over the Straits of Florida. Sometimes, even if those
wishing to emigrate have fulfilled the necessary conditions,
the authorities arbitrarily refuse to let them leave or give
permission to some family members and not others. Being caught
trying to leave illegally is punishable by imprisonment or a
fine but if violence is employed, a more serious charge of
“piracy” can be brought.
The desire to
emigrate is in itself seen by the Cuban authorities as
tantamount to a rejection of the Cuban political system
See footnote 1 and
those who seek to do so are often labeled as
“counter-revolutionaries” or “traitors”. In the two or three
years leading up to the sinking of the “13 de Marzo”,
when economic conditions in Cuba had seriously deteriorated,
there had been a significant increase in the number of
Cubans attempting to leave Cuba by sea to try to reach the
United States which had until that time had a policy of
permitting those Cubans who reached its territory to remain in
the USA. At the same time, despite having agreed in 1984 to
accept up to 20,000 Cubans who sought to emigrate by legal
means, the US authorities had in practice reduced the number
of visas it granted to Cubans. The Cuban Government therefore
claimed that, by withholding visas, the US authorities were
encouraging Cubans to resort to illegal means to leave. They
also accused them of inciting such action via radio and
television broadcasts directed at Cuba by the US government-
funded Radio and TV Martí. Given the traditional hostility
that has existed between the Cuban and US Governments since
the Cuban revolution in 1959 which brought President Fidel
Castro Ruz to power, the argument over Cuban migration in
effect became yet another political battleground between the
two countries with those who were seeking to leave Cuba caught
as pawns in the middle.
The sinking
of the “13 de Marzo” increased the general level of
discontent that clearly already existed in Havana at the time
and sparked off further escape attempts as well as
anti-government protests. In the days that followed, the Cuban
authorities apparently took a conscious decision to cease
preventing illegal departures and the numbers of people trying
to leave Cuba illegally by sea soared. In some instances,
large groups of people tried to hi-jack public ferries and
other vessels, in some cases by violent means. On 19 August
1994, in response to the exodus that ensued, the US Government
ordered the US Coast Guard to prevent undocumented Cubans from
reaching US territorial waters. As a result, between 19 August
and mid-September 1994, some 32,000 Cubans were intercepted by
the US Coast Guard and taken to the US naval base at
Guantánamo Bay, CubaSee
footnote 2. On 9 September 1994, the two governments
announced that they had come to an agreement on how to deal
with migration issues for the future. As part of the
agreement, the Cuban authorities said it would take “effective
measures in every way it can to prevent unsafe departures,
using mainly persuasive methods”. For further information, see
“United States/Cuba: “Rafters” - Pawns of Two Governments”,
AMR 51/86/94, October 1994.
It is
important to note that the escape attempt by those on board
the “13 de Marzo” took place at a point when the Cuban
authorities were actively seeking to deter and prevent such
illegal departures. It is also relevant to point out that it
is not the first time, either before or since, that Amnesty
International has received reports of apparently excessive
force being used by the Cuban authorities to prevent illegal
departures by sea where the lives of unarmed civilians, often
women and children, appear to have been put at risk.
Accounts
by survivors
[Victims:
Estrella Suárez Esquivel, Miralis Fernández Rodríguez and
12-year-old Eliecer Suárez García ]
According
to an account compiled by an unofficial Cuban human rights
group on the basis of interviews carried out with some of the
survivors on the day after the sinking of the “13 de Marzo”
took place, events took place as follows:
"The boat
left [the port of Havana] at about 3.00am. About 45 minutes
later, having advanced nearly seven miles out to sea, they
were intercepted by another Japanese-made tugboat which
started to ram them in order to make them capsize. Another
tugboat soon appeared and, taking over from the first one,
continued doing the same thing. All [the passengers] were
trapped between these two boats, which then began to direct
water at them with high-pressure hoses.The force of this tore
the clothes off the women, knocked them down, and forced the
children out of their arms.
"The
mothers screamed and implored the attackers to stop directing
the water hoses at them because they might cause the young
ones to drown. The perpetrators continued using the hoses
against the citizens, including the children, trying to drown
them by suffocation. Many of the men, women and children on
board were injured by the pressure of the water which threw
them against the bulwarks of the boat. Seconds later, a third
tugboat appeared and attacked forcefully from behind,
splitting the boat in two since it was an old Second World war
boat which had been repaired and was called “13 de Marzo”.
"All those
on board were submerged in the water including those who had
taken refuge in the engine room where they were trying to hang
on to poles, ropes and whatever they could find. After nearly
an hour of battling in the open sea, the other boats circled
round the survivors, creating a whirlpool so that they would
drown. As a result many disappeared into the sea and lost
their lives."
[Victims:
Julia Caridad Ruiz with three-year-old son, Angel René Abreu ]
The
following are extracts from the testimony of survivor Janette
Hernández Gutiérrez, now living in the USA, which was provided
to an unofficial human rights group in Cuba in the days
immediately after the incident occurred:
"As we
were leaving the bay, we saw two tugboats at the mouth of the
bay. As we left, they also left and started directing jets of
water at us. Constantly. They would not stop, even though they
knew there were children on board... the pressurized water
jets were really powerful. We were holding the children,
afraid that they would fall. The men were standing behind us,
afraid that we would fall. But so that they would see that
there were women and children on board, we had to go out on
deck, so that they would be certain of that and would not
commit murder ... At no time did they shoot at us neither did
they at any time order us to halt with the loudspeaker. They
simply let us leave the bay and attacked us seven miles out
where there are no witnesses... They sent one of the tugboats,
the biggest one, which was green with a red line along it,
behind us and it hit us from the stern and broke our boat in
half ... When that happened the boat started to drift because
the captain... was forced into the sea from the pressure of
the water jets.... he disappeared just like that and when Raúl
saw that we were drifting, he assumed responsibility and ran
upstairs..... By then we knew we were going to sink, it was
something I just knew, I had a feeling they were going to kill
us because otherwise they would have stopped . Raúl stopped
the engine... and when they saw that Raúl had stopped it, they
did not forgive that or respect what Raúl did. They sank us in
the following way: the tugboat which had split our stern went
ahead and split us from the prow. That meant there was no way
to keep the tugboat afloat, it was sinking, because the weight
was all in the middle... But they did not throw us lifebelts
or try to help us in any way... Then a "griffin" [coastguard
vessel] arrived, it was the only one which helped us by
throwing us lifebelts but the tugboats stood by doing nothing,
they did not help at all. Later a small speedboat arrived and
picked up about seven people..."
[Victims:
Omar Rodríguez Suárez with two-year-old daughter Sixdy
Rodríguez Fernández ]
Amnesty
International has received similar accounts from interviews it
has carried out with other survivors who were eventually able
to leave Cuba during the August 1994 exodus (see above). In
September 1994, an Amnesty International delegation visited
the US Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba
See footnote 3, where
thousands of Cubans were in detention after being picked up by
the US Coast Guard while trying to reach the USA by sea. One
of the men interviewed by the delegation was one of about five
people in the camps said to be among the 31 survivors of the
sinking of the "13 de Marzo" and who had subsequently again
tried to flee from Cuba. According to his account of events on
13 July 1994, the “13 de Marzo” had already been detected by
the authorities as it was leaving the port of Havana and three
vessels, all also tugboats, started to pursue it straightaway.
However, they were able to continue into open sea. The first
pursuing vessel began to direct jets of water at them. Then
two of the pursuing tugboats deliberately rammed the “13 de
Marzo” while the third, despite their protestations that there
were women and children on board, continued to persistently
direct jets of water into the hold. Once the “13 de Marzo”
started sinking, the other three boats backed off but did not
immediately attempt to rescue those on board. He himself was
by this time in the water. At a certain point he got the
impression that orders were given to pick them up. He was
picked up by what he described as the "least aggressive" of
the three vessels. He said that those on board the three
attacking vessels were dressed in civilian clothes but he did
not believe, as the Cuban authorities alleged, that they were
ordinary dockworkers, especially as several of the crew of one
boat appeared to be suffering from seasickness. He was
arrested, along with the other male survivors, and held at
Villa Marista for 13 days before being released into house
arrest. At the time he left Cuba, another detainee, Raúl Muñoz
García, was still in detention accused of being in charge of
the tugboat and organizer of the escape attempt. However, he
said that in fact Raúl Muñoz was only second-in-command and
that the man in charge
See footnote 4 had drowned. Raúl Muñoz was reportedly
released into house arrest after eight months in detention but
is said to have been subjected to police surveillance and
harassment ever since.
[Victim:
eleven-year-old Yousel Pérez Tacaronte ]
Another
survivor interviewed by Amnesty International in the USA in
May 1996, Sergio Perodin Pérez, said that their departure was
detected by the port authorities as they were leaving the port
and that passers by on shore had also noticed what was
happening. However, the “13 de Marzo” was allowed to continue
on its way for about seven miles. He pointed out that one of
the effects of everything inside the tugboat being drenched
with water from the pressurized water jets was that their
communications equipment no longer worked and they were unable
to call for help. In fact, he believes, from information that
he and other survivors were able to obtain from various
sources, including people working in the Port of Havana, after
the incident took place, that the authorities had found out
about the escape attempt some time beforehand and were lying
in wait for them. At no point did the pursuing vessels warn
those on board what they were going to do or give them any
opportunity to give themselves up. When a foreign cargo boat
came within some 800 metres of where the “13 de Marzo” was
sinking, the vessels which were attacking it temporarily
suspended their activities. After he and some 40 other people
had been forced into the water, the three attacking tugboats
surrounded them, causing a whirlpool. At one point, he said he
heard one of the occupants of the attacking vessels say,
“Let's see what you are going to do now, you sons of whores”.
A coastguard vessel which had followed the “13 de Marzo” and
the other three tugboats out of the port, and which appeared
to be directing operations by radio, eventually picked him and
others up. However, rather than taking them straight to shore
for medical attention, the boat continued sailing around for
some six hours until it was given the order to go to
Jaimanitas on the western outskirts of Havana, where they were
received by 50-60 Interior Ministry officials. The survivors,
who were brought to land on two or three different vessels,
were desperate to know what had happened to the others who
were on board the “13 de Marzo”. When they asked the
authorities who else had survived, they were simply told that
if they could not see them, then the sharks had eaten them.
The women and children were allowed to go home later that day
but the men were handcuffed and questioned until evening when
they were transferred to the State Security headquarters at
Villa Marista in Havana. For the first two days, they were not
allowed to sleep much and had to sleep on the floor but once
the women survivors started speaking out about what had
happened, their treatment improved. He said that the
authorities tried by various means to persuade them to change
their story. In his case, a psychologist was brought in to
work with him. Another of the survivors was reportedly offered
a job working with State Security outside of Cuba which he
refused to do.
Among the
20 male survivors arrested were: Raúl Muñoz García, Sergio
Perodin Pérez, Modesto Almanza Romero, Daniel González
Hernández, Juan Gustavo Martínez Gutiérrez, José Fabian Valdés,
Arquimides Ledreijo Gamboa, Román Lugo Martínez, Fidel
González, Eugenio Fuentes Díaz, Ivan Prieto Suárez, Daniel
Prieto Suárez and Jorge Luis Cuba Suárez. They were reportedly
detained at Villa Marista, with no access to lawyers. All
except Raúl Muñoz García, who was detained for eight months
(see above), were held for approximately one month before
being released into house arrest. It is not clear whether any
formal charges were brought against any of them. One female
survivor, María Victoria García Suárez, who lost thirteen
relatives in the tragedy and who the day afterwards made
statements to foreign journalists contradicting the official
version, was twice taken into custody for questioning in the
days immediately following the incident. She is said to have
been severely traumatized by what happened and to have spent
some time in the Havana Psychiatric Hospital. She and other
survivors who have remained in Cuba have reportedly been kept
under police surveillance and been subjected to limitations on
their freedom of movement. All have been repeatedly warned not
to speak out about what happened to them.
The
vessels which attacked the “13 de Marzo” were reportedly
identified as belonging to the Ministry of Transport and are
called “Polargo 2", “Polargo 3" and “Polargo 5". According to
survivors, “Polargo 5" was the vessel which acted most
aggressively towards them. The fourth vessel which followed
along behind them and which appeared to be directing
operations was believed to belong to the Cuban Coast Guard,
which is part of the Ministry of the Interior.
The
victims
Estimates
of the number of victims have varied. Most survivors concur
that there were some 70-72 people on board the tugboat when it
departed. According to the Cuban Government, 32 people drowned
and 31 were rescued. However, an investigation carried out by
an independent human rights group inside Cuba found that at
least 37 people were missing. So far Amnesty International has
received the names of 35 people who were lost at sea. Most
came from four areas of Havana - Cotorro, Guanabacoa, Marianao
and Arroyo Naranjo. Many were members of the same family.
NAMES OF THOSE WHO DIED
Arroyo Naranjo:
Angel René ABREU Ruiz, 3
Jorge Arquimides LEBRIGIO Flores, 28
Julia Caridad RUIZ Blanco, 35
Cotorro:
Pilar ALMANZA Romero, 30
Yaltamira ANAYA Carrasco, 22
Marta CARRASCO Tamayo, 45
Yuliana ENRIQUEZ Carranza, 23
Sindy RODRIGUEZ Fernández, 2
Manuel GAYOL, 58
Caridad LEYVA Tacoronte, 4
Reinaldo MARRERO, 48
Helen MARTINEZ Enríquez, 6 months
Marjolís MENDEZ Tacoronte, 17
Odalys MUÑOZ García, 21
José Carlos NIKEL Anaya, 3
Leonardo NOTARIO Góngora, 27
Yousel Eugenio PEREZ Tacoronte, 11
Yasse (or Yasser) PERODIN Almanza, 11
Marta Caridad TACORONTE Vega, 33
Guanabacoa:
Ernesto ALFONSO Loureiro,
25
Lissette María ALVAREZ Guerra, 24
Giselle (or Lisette) BORGES Alvarez, 4
Lázaro BORGES Briel, 34
Joel GARCIA Suárez, 24
Armando GONZALEZ Raíz (or Raizes), 50
Augusto Guillermo GUERRA Martínez, 45
Mario GUTIERREZ, 35
Elio Juan GUTIERREZ García, 10
Fidelio Ramel PRIETO Hernández, 50
Marianao:
Miralis FERNANDEZ
Rodríguez, 27
Eduardo SUAREZ Esquivel, 35
Eliecer SUAREZ García, 11
Estrella SUAREZ Esquivel, 45
Yolindis RODRIGUEZ Rivero, 2
Omar RODRIGUEZ Suárez, 30
Government
version of events
Conflicting
reports of the incident appeared in the Cuban media, which are
entirely state- controlled, some alleging that the “13 de
Marzo” sank simply because it was very old and not seaworthy
and others saying that it sank because it had accidentally
collided with the pursuing vessels. On 14 July 1994, the day
after the tragedy, Granma, the official Communist Party
newspaper, in an article entitled “Capsized Tugboat robbed by
Anti-Social Elements” described what happened as an
“irresponsible act of piracy promoted and stimulated by
counter-revolutionary radio stations, the most reactionary
elements of the [Cuban exile] nest of maggots in Miami, and by
the well-known failure of the United States to abide by
migration agreements”. On 16 July 1994 it published a note
from the Ministry of the Interior saying that the appropriate
authorities had investigated circumstances surrounding the
sinking of the tugboat and found that it had taken place as a
result of a collision between the “13 de Marzo” and another
tugboat which was attempting to catch up with it. It said that
those involved in the escape plan had known that the “13 de
Marzo” had been leaking before its departure and that they had
behaved irresponsibly by going ahead anyway. It admitted that
the manoeuvres of the three vessels belonging to the Ministry
of Transport in trying to intercept it and prevent its
highjacking had provoked “the unfortunate accident” but said
that two coast guard units on patrol nearby immediately rushed
to the aid of the people on board and that the three Transport
Ministry vessels also joined in the rescue effort. It said
that, given the conditions of navigation and the force of the
currents (Force 3) in the early hours of the morning, only 31
people were rescued alive. The rest of the persons belonging
to the group had been lost at sea and the principal leader was
being detained.
An article
published in Granma on 23 July 1994 alleged that Fidencio
Ramel Prieto Ramos, said to be the organizer of the escape
attempt, who was on duty as operations officer of the Havana
port authority, stole the “13 de Marzo” after knocking out the
night watchman with a drug which he had put in his drink. It
claimed that the boat, which was made of wood, had been built
in 1879, that it was known to leak and that too many people
were on board. It then went on to cite statements supporting
the official version of events allegedly made by four of the
male survivors, who were at the time still in detention
without access to lawyers. From its interviews with two of the
male survivors (see above), Amnesty International believes
that there is reason to believe that these statements were
made under duress. In one of the statements, said to have been
made by Raúl Múñoz García [see above], he admitted trying to
ram one of the pursuing tugboats early on in the chase. All
four appeared to admit that it was irresponsible of them to
have attempted to undertake the journey in the first place in
such a vessel.
he Cuban
authorities have never made public any further information
relating to the circumstances of the sinking of the “13 de
Marzo”. According to unofficial sources, a very limited police
investigation may have taken place but was reportedly filed in
the Havana prosecutor's office, Fiscalía Provincial de la
Ciudad de la Habana. In response to requests by family members
and lawyers, the prosecutor's office reportedly responded in
mid-1995 that there were no plans to initiate legal
proceedings in connection with the sinking of the “13 de Marzo”.
Relatives of the victims were also told by the authorities
that it had not been possible to locate and recover the bodies
of the victims or the boat itself. It is not clear whether any
concerted effort was made by the authorities to do so.
However, from unconfirmed reports some survivors have received
from people who were involved in the rescue, they believe that
some of the bodies may have been located and disposed of or
hidden by the authorities.
Calls for
investigation from within Cuba
On 19 July
1994, the Archbishop of Havana and President of the Conference
of Catholic Bishops of Cuba, Monsignor Jaime Ortega Alamino,
expressed his sorrow for the loss of so many lives and said
that “the sinking of the vessel, which was carrying women and
children, and the difficulties of the rescue of the survivors
do not appear to be in any way accidental. This adds to the
sorrow a feeling of astonishment and a need for the facts to
be clarified and responsibilities to be established.. What can
lead a human being to set off on such risky ventures except a
certain degree of desperation or despair? What can lead other
human beings to use such unusual force against their brothers
other than a violent mentality?”
On 10 July
1995, lawyer René Gómez Manzano, who has faced problems from
the authorities on several occasions before and since then
because of his political views and his professional activities
in defence of political prisoners
See footnote 5, wrote
to the Minister of Justice expressing his surprise that over a
year after the incident, the courts had not carried out an
investigation to determine how it had happened. On 20 July
1995, a group of seven other lawyers, including Dr Leonel
Morejón Almagro See
footnote 6, and two members of the public also sent an
open letter to the Minister of Justice and the Attorney
General requesting that a criminal investigation be opened
into the events surrounding the sinking of the “13 de Marzo”.
Both letters questioned in particular why no investigation had
been opened under article 184 of the Cuban Penal Code,
“Offences committed in the course of Rail, Air and Maritime
Traffic” which provides for the punishment of anyone who
causes an accident by failing to abide by the relevant laws
and regulations. The second letter ended as follows: “...
until the suspicious deaths of the innocent are clarified,
there will be no light in our country, or in our justice...
There is no excuse for silence, silence cannot be forgiven.
Nothing justifies crime, even [if it is carried out] in the
name of the Revolution. That reminds us of when people have
been killed in the name of God... We are waiting for justice
to act.” As far as Amnesty International is aware, the
authorities did not respond to either of the letters.
International condemnation of the incident
In October
1996 the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the
Organization of American States condemned the sinking of the
tugboat saying that there was clear evidence that it was not
an accident but “a premeditated and intentional act”. It
concluded that it constituted a violation of the rights to
life, physical integrity, free movement and justice. It
recommended that the Cuban Government carry out a full
investigation and punish those responsible, compensate the
survivors and relatives of the victims, and take steps to
recover the bodies and the wreck of the boat.
In 1996, in
his report to the 52nd Session of the UN Commission on Human
Rights See footnote 7,
the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary
Executions stated that he had transmitted allegations
concerning the case to the Cuban Government in June 1995 and
expressed deep concern that he had not received a reply. He
urged that the allegations be properly investigated, the
perpetrators brought to justice and the victims' families
compensated. The UN Special Rapporteur on Cuba, in his interim
report to the UN General Assembly dated 7 October 1996, also
expressed serious concern “about the fact that an event of
this magnitude, in which 37 people died, has not been
investigated” See
footnote 8.
Subsequent
arrests and other violations relating to the incident
In the days
immediately following the tragedy, the authorities attempted
to prevent any protest or public demonstration of grief. A
mass for the victims had to be cancelled and people wearing
black armbands as a sign of mourning were also reportedly
detained briefly. Relatives of the victims were also
reportedly prevented from throwing flowers into the sea on the
grounds that that is only usually done for “martyrs of the
Revolution”. On 23 July 1994 Aida Rosa Jiménez of the
Movimiento de Madres Cubanas Por la Solidaridad, Movement of
Cuban Mothers for Solidarity, which had called on Cuba women
to wear black or purple ribbons for three days as a sign of
mourning, was arrested at her home and taken to State Security
headquarters at Villa Marista. She was reportedly told by
officials that it was because of her efforts to encourage
people to attend a mass in commemoration of the victims of the
tugboat sinking. Seven other human rights activists, Nelson
Torres Pulido, Odilia Collazo Valdés, Oscar Gutiérrez, Lázaro
Rodríguez, Martha Losada, Horacio Casanova and Nelida Vera
Pérez, all members of the unofficial Partido Pro Derechos
Humanos en Cuba (PPDHC), Party for Human Rights in Cuba, who
were trying to investigate the events, were also detained on
22 July 1994 and held for three days before being released
without charge.
In December
1994, a woman who lost her daughter, her brother and two other
relatives in the incident made an appeal to international
human rights organizations and governments which concluded as
follows: “This crime cannot remain unpunished. We who suffered
their [the victims'] physical disappearance can only cry and
be silent. We keep a vigil by their photos with Rapid Response
Brigades See footnote 9
standing by. We have been warned not to put at risk the safety
of those who survived. Everything is clear, we have to keep
quiet. But you who are free to shout to the world that
incidents like this should not be repeated must not forget
this massacre... We only ask for the remains of our loved ones
and that justice is done for this horrendous crime.”
In July 1995,
at the time of the first anniversary of the sinking of the "13
de Marzo", an extensive police operation was reportedly
carried out in Havana to prevent any commemorative activities
from taking place and a number of political and human rights
activists were briefly detained. A mass in commemoration of
the victims that was scheduled to take place at the Church of
the Sacred Heart of Jesus was cancelled by the authorities and
the church was closed.
On the second
anniversary in 1996, the authorities again took action to
prevent protests or activities commemorating the sinking of
the “13 de Marzo”. On 5 July 1996 Isabel del Pino Sotolongo,
president of an unofficial group called Seguidores de Cristo
Rey, Followers of Christ the King, was reportedly arrested in
a Havana park where she was displaying the photos of the
victims of the tugboat sinking and distributing leaflets
containing quotes from the Bible. She was released later that
day but warned that she was under investigation on several
charges. Aida Rosa Jiménez, who was planning to hold a prayer
meeting in a church on 13 July 1996, was told that she should
pray at home. She was warned that if she tried to go to church
that day, she would be arrested.
Conclusions
Given the
grave accusations of the survivors, the contradictory official
accounts of the incident and the failure of the Cuban
authorities to carry out a full and impartial investigation
and to make the findings public, as well as the fact that
those seeking such an investigation or even simply to
commemorate the incident have faced intimidation and
harassment, Amnesty International believes that there are
serious reasons to doubt the official version of events. While
acknowledging that those on board the “13 de Marzo” had
committed a crime by stealing the tugboat, there is no
evidence to suggest that they were armed or that they were in
a position to offer any serious resistance to the pursuing
vessels. Indeed, from many of the survivors' accounts, it
appears that their pleas to surrender and to be rescued may
have been deliberately ignored. Amnesty International has
therefore concluded that at the very least the force employed
by the pursuing vessels to prevent the departure of the “13 de
Marzo” was disproportionate to the nature of the crime,
especially taking into account the risk to the lives of those
on board the “13 de Marzo” who included women and children.
The Cuban authorities have argued that those on board the
pursuing vessels were dock workers acting on their own
initiative and not government or law enforcement officials.
However, several of the survivors have doubted this assertion
and have alleged that the whole operation appeared to be
coordinated and directed by radio from a coast guard vessel.
The Cuban coast guard service falls under the jurisdiction of
the Ministry of the Interior. Amnesty International believes
that there is sufficient evidence to indicate that it was an
official operation and that, if events occurred in the way
described by several of the survivors, those who died as a
result of the incident were victims of extrajudicial
execution.
Recommendations
Amnesty
International is therefore making the following
recommendations to the Cuban Government:
-
That a
full and impartial investigation into the sinking of the "13
de Marzo" tugboat be carried out immediately, and that the
findings be made public.
-
That
such an investigation be carried out in accordance with
international standards, including the UN Principles on the
Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra- Legal,
Arbitrary and Summary Executions.
-
That
anyone identified as being responsible for the loss of life
be brought to justice in accordance with international
standards for a fair trial.
-
That
the families and dependents of the victims be granted fair
and adequate compensation within a reasonable period of
time.
-
That
the relatives of the victims be fully informed of what
efforts were made to locate the bodies of the victims and,
if any were found, what happened to the remains.
-
That
survivors or relatives of the victims be permitted to speak
out about what happened without fear of reprisals.
-
That
no further reprisals be taken against anyone who seeks to
peacefully protest or commemorate the sinking of the “13 de
Marzo”.
-
That
no one should be imprisoned for attempting to leave the
country illegally if they have not committed any other
recognizable criminal offence.
That
strict orders be issued to law enforcement officials and
agents acting on their behalf to abide at all times by the UN
Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law
Enforcement Officials.
Footnote: 1
The Cuban Constitution declares Cuba to be a socialist state.
Only one political party - the Partido Comunista de Cuba (PCC),
Cuban Communist Party - is permitted to exist.
Footnote: 2
The USA maintains the naval base at Guantánamo Bay on the
mainland of Cuba under the terms of an agreement reached in
1903 when the country was under US occupation. The lease was
renewed in 1934 and although the current Cuban Government,
which came to power in 1959, objects to the presence of the
base on Cuban territory, it has continued to remain there.
Footnote: 3
See footnote 2. Amnesty International has been unable to
conduct an investigation inside Cuba itself because the Cuban
authorities have not permitted the organization to visit the
country to carry out research since 1988.
Footnote: 4
Fidelio Ramel Prieto Hernández, the former head of operations
at the Port of Havana as well as a Communist Party official.
Footnote: 5
See “Cuba: Government Crackdown on Dissent”, AMR 25/14/96,
April 1996 See “Cuba: Government Crackdown on Dissent”, AMR
25/14/96, April 1996
Footnote: 6
Idem.
Footnote: 7
E/CN.4/1996/4
Footnote: 8
A/51/460, 7 October 1996
Footnote: 9
Government-organized groups of Communist Party members,
participation of which is supposed to be voluntary, set up
with the aim of “defending the country, the Revolution and
socialism in all circumstances, by confronting and liquidating
any sign of counter-revolution or crime”, wherever it might
appear. Amnesty International has received frequent reports of
acts of intimidation and even physical violence carried out by
such brigades against known dissidents. See “Cuba: Silencing
the Voices of Dissent”, AMR 25/26/92, December 1992 for
further background. Government-organized groups of Communist
Party members, participation of which is supposed to be
voluntary, set up with the aim of “defending the country, the
Revolution and socialism in all circumstances, by confronting
and liquidating any sign of counter-revolution or crime”,
wherever it might appear. Amnesty International has received
frequent reports of acts of intimidation and even physical
violence carried out by such brigades against known
dissidents. See “Cuba: Silencing the Voices of Dissent”, AMR
25/26/92, December 1992 for further background.
AI Index: AMR
25/13/97
Amnesty
International July 1997 |